Principles of Good Practice
in Combining Service and Learning
1. Academic Credit is for Learning, Not for
Service
Credit in academic courses is assigned
to students for the demonstration of academic learning. It should
be no different in community service learning courses. When community
service is integrated into an academic course, the course credit
is assigned for both the customary academic learning as well as
for the utilization of the community learning toward realizing
the course objectives.
2. Do Not Compromise Academic Rigor
The additional workload imposed
by community service assignments may be compensated by an additional
credit but not by lowering academic learning expectations. Adding
a service component, in fact, may enhance the rigor of a course.
In addition to having to master the academic material, students
must also learn how to learn from a community experience and merge
that learning with academic learning. These intellectual activities,
if constructed correctly, are commensurate with rigorous academic
standards.
3. Set Learning Goals for Students
By integrating the community with
the classroom, there occurs a multiplication of possible learning
paradigms (e.g. experiential learning, inductive learning, participatory
action research) and learning topics (e.g. the community, the
public good). Nevertheless, it is crucial to have a clear sense
of the course objectives when designing the service learning component.
4. Establish Criteria for the Selection of Community
Service Placements
There are three essentials to consider
here:
- the range of service placements ought to
be circumscribed by the content of the course
- the duration of the service must be sufficient
to enable the fulfillment of learning goals
- the specific service activities and service
contexts must have the potential to stimulate course-relevant
learning
5. Provide Educationally Sound Mechanisms to
Facilitate the Community-based Learning
Course assignments and learning
formats must be carefully developed to facilitate the students'
learning from their community service experiences. Experience,
as a learning format, in and of itself, does not consummate learning,
nor does mere written description of one's service activities.
Discussions, presentations, and journal and paper assignments
that provoke analysis of service experiences in the context of
the course objectives are necessary.
6. Provide Supports for Students to Learn how
to Engage in Community-based Learning
Acquiring knowledge from the community
and utilizing it on behalf of course objectives is a paradigm
for which many students are under-prepared. Faculty can support
students in their efforts to realize the potential of community-based
learning by helping them obtain the necessary skills and/or by
providing examples of successful projects.
7. Minimize the Distinction between the Student's
Community Learning Role and the Classroom Learning Role
Typically, classrooms and communities
are very different environments, each requiring students to assume
a different role as a learner. Classrooms generally provide a
high level of learning direction and structure. In contrast, community-based
learning tends to necessitate greater leadership and initiative
on the part of the student. A mechanism is needed that will provide
learning direction for the students in the community (e.g. community
agency staff serving as an adjunct instructor). The more one can
make consistent the student's learning role in the classroom with
her/his learning role in the community, the better the chances
that the learning potential within each context will be realized.
8. Rethink the Faculty Instructional Role
The role of the educator must take
a less conventional form in service learning. Rather than emphasizing
the dissemination of information, the educator must focus more
on being a facilitator and guide to student learning. This means
that some course content must be sacrificed.
Adapted from: Jeffrey Howard,
ed. Praxis I: A Faculty Casebook on Community Service Learning.
Ann Arbor, MI: Office of Community Service Learning Press,
University of Michigan. 1993.
An effective and sustained service learning
program:
1. Explicitly connects the service component to
course objectives
2. Engages students in activities for the public
good which meet real needs of the community
3. Provides structured opportunities for students
to reflect critically on their service experience
4. Allows for those with special needs to define
those needs
5. Clarifies the responsibilities of each student
and organization involved
6. Matches service providers and service needs through
a process that recognizes changing circumstances.
7. Expects genuine, active and sustained organizational
commitment
8. Includes training, supervision, monitoring, support,
recognition and evaluation to meet service and learning goals.
9. Insures that the time commitment for service
and learning is flexible, appropriate and in the best interest
of all involved.
10. Is committed to program participation by and
with diverse populations.
Adapted from: The Johnson Foundation Wingspread
Report on the Principles of Good Practice in Combining Service and
Learning. 1989.